Television has many useful and educational programs that can help children learn useful things, some knowledge about nature from the programs on television. However, watching TV regularly is not necessarily good for children. So I disagree about letting children watch TV regularly at school and at home.

Watching television regularly will make children have eye problems, addiction to television and will have health consequences such as obesity and asthma. Not only does TV not only have educational programs but it also has many programs that teach children about bad habits, causing many children to engage in aggressive, violent or irritable behaviors. In addition, it can also reduce creativity and imagination, become ineffective at work, and watch a lot of TV will decrease academic performance. Affects perception of the world around them. Lack of social language skills, limited interaction with others and other essential social skills.

So avoid letting children watch TV a lot, as it can greatly affect future generations . We need to encourage children to participate in outdoor activities to exercise their health. 

For centuries, deforestation, farming, urbanisation and other human activities have wreaked havoc with wild animal species and sent them to the verge of extinction. Regarding wildlife protection, awareness has been raised and attempts have been made. However, some hold the idea that the protection of endangered species has been given inordinate amount of attention and resources. Personally, I do not see eye to eye with this point of view.In the first place, wildlife protection has never taken centre stage on the media.Compared with celebrities, for example, the amount of coverage of wild animals isinfinitesimal. Clearly, the reason is profits. In other words, programs featuring wildanimals do not generate interest of the public and accordingly returns for theproducers. The absence of educational programs concerning the lives of wild animalshas blinded people to the reality that wild animals are dying and the ecological systemare being disrupted severely. In addition, governments around the world do not prioritise wildlife conservation in their agenda’s. As a matter of fact, laws to save wild animals have been introduced, but they are loosely enforced. Because of this, every man can freely exploit land, chop down forests, and divert the water sources, all of which combine to destroy the natural habitats of threatened animals. In every corners of the world, with or without intention, human are still causing changes in climatic and geopgraphical conditions, which accelerates of animal extinction. In light of this fact, I feel that not enough attention and resources are being given in the conservation of wild flora and fauna and stronger actions need to be taken to save them.

Music is a great way to bring people of different cultures and ages together” -I totally agree with this point. I think EDM (Electronic Dance Music) is the best music that I've heard. people create. Music plays an important role in our modern world. It can eliminate cultural and generational differences. Music has the ability to broaden people's horizons and welcome different cultures from all over the world. Needless to say, each country has its own traditions to enforce their culture and norms. Music can bridge this cultural gap and is a great way to help individuals collaborate better with others. For example, music parties like Tomorrowland are held all over the world, giving citizens from all over the world the opportunity to get in touch with the national culture and gain a deeper understanding of it. Overall, we cannot deny the importance of music in our lives and its ability to connect people from different cultural backgrounds and ages.

            _{In recent years, Traffic congestion and pollution have increased significantly and become a major problem worldwide. Some people think that increasing petrol prices will solve such problems. Although it is possible that higher gas prices will solve traffic and pollution problems to a large extent, I completely disagree with this opinion. I believe that increasing the cost of petrol is not a viable solution that everyone can do. Although it can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, it brings many disadvantages or difficulties for people both physically and mentally. Increasing gasoline prices is only a matter of time. Because businesses know in advance, if the world gasoline price increases, they will be compensated by the State (or sooner or later people will also suffer because the State increases the price), and if the world price decreases, They still sell at a high price. People have witnessed too many times when the world gasoline price increases, the domestic gasoline price increases, but the opposite happens very rarely: the world gasoline price decreases while the domestic gasoline price remains stationary. Instead of increasing the price of gasoline. fuel, the government can take a number of other measures to effectively deal with this problem. First, corporate companies whose employees only require a computer to do their jobs should allow them to work from home at least 3-4 days a week. This will reduce the carbon footprint of commuters who go to work every day. Another solution is that governments should create new laws that limit the number of vehicles a household can own. This will limit unnecessary spending on new cars and motorbikes. Both of these solutions can have a positive impact on the environment while discouraging excessive vehicle use. Improving the frequency and reliability of public transport is another way to encourage private car use. A better solution is to find measures that will work in the long run. To illustrate, increased investment in alternative fuels and improved public transport are more effective measures than increasing gasoline prices. Traffic and pollution problems will not be solved until people start using public transport. For this reason, the government should provide cheap public transport and ban cars from the city center. In short, air pollution and traffic problems cannot be solved by increasing spending. fuel costs. Instead, the government should make public transport more reliable and promote work-from-home options to reduce people's need to travel.}

If gasoline is increasing if you don't know how to use it, it will be polluted and the air will not be good and I disagree, and here are my solutions to protect the environment:
Plant many green trees
No littering
Pick up trash when you see it
No smoking and no littering vứt
Do not burn trees and do not kill trees
Do not harvest too much wood
Must know how to love green plants
Should clean up the roadside garbage to let the air fresh
should not pee in green trees and do heavy hygiene
Here are the ways you can solve to protect the environment, teachers tick

Traffic congestion and pollution are two pressing issues all over the world. As the majority of cars and motobikes are petrol driven, elevating petrol price can reduce their numbers on the roads, and as a result, help control traffic congestions and pollution to a great extent, I agree. Unlike the past, when only rich people could afford automobiles, a majority of car and motorbike owners, these days, are from middle-class families. Therefore, a higher fuel cost will affect their budget. Such surge in prices will increase the demand for public transportations which is by far the most efficient way to pull out the pollution. Moreover, such a price hike will make eco-friendly automobiles popular. For instance, electric cars or electric bikes can become a viable option for consumers. Although it cannot reduce traffic problems, it can reduce pollutions effectively. Other solutions can also be considered instead of upscaling petroleum price only. To begin with, the government can implement policies to restrict the number of cars per family can own, and also offer subsidies to citizens to purchase electric cars and eletric bikes. To conclude, increasing petrol price will open the doors for alternative options which can, directly and indirectly, combat both traffic and pollution problems.

Some people believe that printed newspapers are becoming worthless in the contemporary life. While there are a variety of ground supporting this view, I would argue that printed newspapers continue to play an essential role in life.
Continuous advancement in technology provides people with more convenient options for gathering news which are alternatives for printed newspapers. First, an enormous number of articles or reports nowadays could be assessed merely via smartphones or computer with the internet connection, and not only does the news contain a broad spectrum of contents but it can also be updated by the minute. It is obviously more convenient than the traditional measure of reading news, for example, on daily newspapers with limited content in few pages. Second, the spread of alternative options namely the radio or the internet which reach almost every corner of the world has reduced the dependence on printed newspapers as a main source of information.
Despite such advantages of the news conveys by other faster means, I consider that there is still a continuing need for printed newspapers today. One reason is that reading a newspaper is a daily habit which many people, especially the elderly, still enjoy. They are really interested in the leisurely routine of reading newspapers over breakfast or drinking cups of coffee. Another consideration is people can share the newspapers with others since printed newspapers can simply be picked up or put down at a will. For example, I often read a newspaper on the train or bus and then leave the paper on the seat for other passengers if they wish.
In conclusion, albeit the increasing availability of other high-speed sources of news, newspapers still contribute a certain value to human life today.

I agree with this statement because playing outside will reduce stress, while using the computer for too long will lead to eye damage.

Yeah, I agree with this statement

Nowadays testing has an extremely prominent place in education. The preparation required for examinations places limits on teachers as well as considerable amounts of stress on students. While some testing may be necessary to gain a better understanding of what a child has learned, I completely agree that excessive testing is too restricting for teachers. Furthermore, it can actually inhibit students’ learning and potentially be damaging over the long term. Firstly, with the heavy emphasis placed on exams, teachers must teach only to the test. The result of this is that teachers cannot take the time to answer students’ questions about the content. This is because there is only time to teach what is going to be in the exam. This squashes children’s natural interest in subjects. Another point to consider is that studies have shown that any student, regardless of age or subject, needs time to consolidate learning before being tested. A student who is tested too soon may get a low mark which is actually not representative of this student’s learning. Continual testing, therefore, does not take in account students’ natural developmental stages. Finally, the amount of stress placed on students to pass all these exams is not healthy. The continual cycle of preparing for a test and taking a test can exhaust and burn out even the most motivated student. This is particularly dangerous when pupils are still young. It also removes the natural joy that comes from learning for both teachers and students when exams are constantly looming over their heads. In conclusion, although a certain amount of testing will always be required at schools, I firmly believe that the current emphasis placed on tests is unnecessary and could have longterm negative effects on students.

KHÔNG NGỜ CŨNG CÓ CÁI WRITING TASK 2 CỦA IELTS Ở ĐÂY LUN Á :V

"Education is not just about going to school and getting degree. it is about widening your knowledge and absorbing the truth about life". In today's era the school system is over focused on testing. This results in stress on students about learning, and also teachers seem helpless, and are unable to adapt course to meet the needs of individuals. I am totally argue with the statement, and also give reasons as well as provide possible solutions for this.

To begin with, Teachers are unable to teach students with interest due to lack of timing. School Authorities will pressurize the teachers for completing their syllabus in a particular time. As a result of it, they are unable to give proper information to students. This results in bad performance of students in their exams. For instance, Delhi school community declared that there are still many schools; there intentions is only teach students no matter how much knowledge students gain from teachers. The solutions of this, could be limited test should conducted by school authorities to help teachers teaching the students with full knowledge and self-assureness

Read the text then answer the questions.

Television viewing is a major activity and influence on children. Children in the United States watch an average of three to four hours of television a day.

While television can entertain, inform, and keep our children company, it may also influence them in undesirable ways. Time spent watching television takes away from important activities such as reading, school work, playing, exercise, family interaction, and social development. Children who watch a lot of television are likely to have lower grades in school, read fewer books, exercise less, and be overweight.

Parents can help by doing the following:

♦ Don’t allow children to watch long blocks of TV.

♦ Help them choose suitable programmes. Children’s shows on public TV are appropriate, but soap operas, adult sitcoms and adult talk shows are not.

♦ Set certain periods when the television will be off. Study times are for learning, not for sitting in front of the TV doing homework.

Make TV viewing an active process for child and parent!

1. How much TV do children in the United States watch on an average day?

Children in the United States watch an average of three to four hours of television a day.

2. What are the good effects of television on children?

It can entertain, inform, and keep the children company.

3. What may be the bad effects of watching too much TV on school work?

Time spent watching television takes away from important activities such as reading, school work, playing, exercise, family interaction, and social development.

4. Should parents let their children watch TV for a long time?

No, they shouldn't.

5. Which programmes are appropriate for children and which are not?

Children’s shows on public TV are appropriate, but soap operas, adult sitcoms and adult talk shows are not.

6. What can parents do to limit their child’s screen time?

Set certain periods when the television will be off.

1. Children in the United States watch an average of three to four hours of television a day.

2. Television can entertain, inform, and keep our children company.

3. Children who watch a lot of television are likely to have lower grades in school, read fewer books, exercise less, and be overweight.

4. No, they shouldn't.

5. Children’s shows on public TV are appropriate, but soap operas, adult sitcoms and adult talk shows are not.

#MinhNgoc (Chúc bạn học tốt!)