In the modern days, the accomodation affects us very much so choosing a properly place to live is an important thing to do. 

Everyone will consider living in the city or in the countryside but if we take a closer look , we will see the advantages and disadvantages of each. For examples, the city may convenient but the countryside is more green and beautiful than the city. If the children who live in city, they may be successful but their health is not. Otherwise, the children who live in the countryside may not approach to high techonology and modern studying methods but their minds aren't under pressure of studying too much. In short, every place has each advantages and disadvantages but I think living in the city will be good for children

Growing up in the countryside is better for children than in a big city. For this reason, I agree:

First, it has fresher air than a big city. After the stressful lessons children will feel more relaxed. They're not only delighted in the rice fields too. Second, the cost of living is very cheap in the countryside. So, people in the city often come here for the summer vacation to rent or buy to stay.

Thirst of all, the countryside environment is much cleaner than the town itself. For example, in the countryside there are fewer means of transportation than the city, environmental pollution in the city is a societal hot issue.

Nowadays, we live in the tall buildings in the urban area. In contrast, in the past, people lived in the countryside. Do you think that children living in the countryside is better than living in the urban area? In this essay, I will argue that the benefit of children living in the countryside outweighs living in the tall building in the urban area.

The air in countryside is fresher than in the urban area. Many people there do not have cars, so the noise and air pollution does not exist in the countryside, but in the urban area, it is serious. As a result, it is especially good for children to grow up because the fresh air will not create a lot of respiratory problems, such as, asthma. Fresh air can also make their brains become fresh because their sight is not blocked by the tall buildings. People living there see the green trees, grasses and colourful flowers which will make them happy. They will not have shortsightedness.

The environment in countryside is also very quieter than in the urban area. Since there are not too many cars and children there do not like to watch TV, it is very quiet there. At the daytime, children may go to school while in the evening, they may chat with their neighbours and play chess. They sleep at around 7pm. Their living is very simple but happy life.

Children are simple and friendly. They are fostered to take care of one another, so neighbours have a close relationship. The population density of living in the urban area is much higher than that in the countryside, however, neighbours do not have a close relationship. They only care about themselves but not other people. Children living in the countryside want to have a simple life ; they only want things that are natural, not luxurious .

All in all, I think that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in the urban area, so that they will know the importance of caring other people. They should not be materialistic . They can have a happy childhood.

2.In modern world, technology has played an active role in people physical lives; on the other hand, it can not touch our spiritual lives while art can. One of several reasons related to this is that art help us express our soul. Actually science is a combinations of tools, methods and machines which solve our physical problems. Meanwhile art such as colorful drawings, paintings, rock songs, romantic movies gives painters, film writers a ability to express their ideas and feelings. That is why art probably touch our soul. Other reason is a benefit of enjoying artworks to who enjoy art. It for instance listening to music and watching movie helps listeners and viewers feel relax after a hard-working day fulled of stress. While, techonology can not cause it can only solve our particular troubles, save time and cost, not a spiritual troubles. In short, both science and art play a significant role in human life, people are not able to live without one of those.

Online learning has emerged as a convenient and effective alternative to traditional classroom instruction. In this essay, I firmly agree with the statement that online learning not only offers convenience but also proves to be more effective than traditional classroom teaching. Firstly, online learning provides unmatched convenience for both students and teachers. With the click of a button, students can access course materials, lectures, and assignments at any time and from any location. This flexibility allows individuals to tailor their learning experience around their personal schedules, enabling them to balance work, family commitments, and education effectively. Moreover, online platforms eliminate the need for lengthy commutes and provide an inclusive learning environment, as students from various geographic locations can access the same resources and expertise. Secondly, online learning has demonstrated its effectiveness through improved outcomes and engagement. The personalized nature of online courses allows students to progress at their own pace, ensuring a thorough understanding of the subject matter. Adaptive learning tools and assessments help identify areas of weakness and provide targeted interventions, enabling students to strengthen their knowledge gaps. Additionally, online platforms often incorporate interactive multimedia, simulations, and gamification techniques, which enhance student engagement and promote active learning. Furthermore, online learning encourages the development of valuable digital skills that are increasingly vital in today's technology-driven world. Students become proficient in navigating online platforms, utilizing digital resources, and collaborating in virtual environments. These skills are transferable to various professional settings and enhance students' employability prospects. While face-to-face interactions are seen as a strength of traditional classrooms, online learning has adapted by incorporating discussion forums, video conferencing, and group projects. These tools foster meaningful interactions, promote peer learning, and create a sense of community among students. In conclusion, online learning offers unparalleled convenience, personalized learning experiences, and the development of digital skills. Its flexibility and effectiveness make it a superior alternative to traditional classroom instruction. By embracing online learning, we can create a more accessible and efficient education system that meets the diverse needs of students and teachers in the modern world.