It's possible that they haven't been notified of the changes in the timetable.
➝They might..........................
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
The Amazon rainforest is home to more than a third of all the world's species of plants, birds and animals. Twenty per cent of all the birds in the world live in the rainforest. Scientists have discovered thousands of types of plants and animals that can only be found there. There are thousands - probably millions more that we haven't discovered yet. There are at least 2.5 million species of insects there. Imagine what would happen if they all lost their home? It couldn't happen, could it? Unfortunately, it's happening right now. Yet, the rainforest is big. But it's getting smaller. The problem is that people are cutting down the trees, mainly to make room for cows. These provide meat and make money for their owners. This process of cutting down trees is called ‘deforestation'.
The good news is that it is slowing down. In 2004, for example, more than 27,000 square kilometres were cut down. That's an area bigger than Wales. In 2006, because of all the campaigns to save rainforest, it dropped to just over 13,000 square kilometres. The bad news is that it's not enough. Scientists predict that by 2030, the rainforest will have become smaller by 40%. It's possible that by the end of the 21st century, the rainforest will have completely disappeared. With deforestation, thousands of the animals, birds, fish and plants that live in the Amazon rainforest lose their home, their natural habitat. Some of them move to other areas, but most of them die. Many species have already become extinct, and many more will if deforestation continues. That will change the balance of life in the rainforest and could cause enormous problems to the region's ecosystem.
There's another problem too. Trees and plants are a vital source of oxygen. If we cut them down, we lose that oxygen. But it's worse than just that. With deforestation, the trees and plants are burnt. This sends gases into the Earth's atmosphere, which stops some of the Earth's heat escaping. That then leads to the temperature here on the ground going up. This increase in the world's temperature is called 'global warming', and most scientists believe it's a very serious issue. If they stopped deforestation, it might help prevent global warming.
Question. What might help to restrain global warming?
A. increasing deforestation
B. stabilising deforestation
C. stop cutting down trees
D. clearing more trees for farming
Đáp án C
Thông tin: If they stopped deforestation, it might help prevent global warming.
Dịch: Nếu họ ngừng phá rừng, điều đó có thể giúp ngăn chặn sự nóng lên toàn cầu.
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
The Amazon rainforest is home to more than a third of all the world's species of plants, birds and animals. Twenty per cent of all the birds in the world live in the rainforest. Scientists have discovered thousands of types of plants and animals that can only be found there. There are thousands - probably millions more that we haven't discovered yet. There are at least 2.5 million species of insects there. Imagine what would happen if they all lost their home? It couldn't happen, could it? Unfortunately, it's happening right now. Yet, the rainforest is big. But it's getting smaller. The problem is that people are cutting down the trees, mainly to make room for cows. These provide meat and make money for their owners. This process of cutting down trees is called ‘deforestation'.
The good news is that it is slowing down. In 2004, for example, more than 27,000 square kilometres were cut down. That's an area bigger than Wales. In 2006, because of all the campaigns to save rainforest, it dropped to just over 13,000 square kilometres. The bad news is that it's not enough. Scientists predict that by 2030, the rainforest will have become smaller by 40%. It's possible that by the end of the 21st century, the rainforest will have completely disappeared. With deforestation, thousands of the animals, birds, fish and plants that live in the Amazon rainforest lose their home, their natural habitat. Some of them move to other areas, but most of them die. Many species have already become extinct, and many more will if deforestation continues. That will change the balance of life in the rainforest and could cause enormous problems to the region's ecosystem.
There's another problem too. Trees and plants are a vital source of oxygen. If we cut them down, we lose that oxygen. But it's worse than just that. With deforestation, the trees and plants are burnt. This sends gases into the Earth's atmosphere, which stops some of the Earth's heat escaping. That then leads to the temperature here on the ground going up. This increase in the world's temperature is called 'global warming', and most scientists believe it's a very serious issue. If they stopped deforestation, it might help prevent global warming.
Question. In paragraph 2, the word "it” refers to ____.
A. room
B. process
C. rainforest
D. deforestation
Đáp án D
Thông tin: This process of cutting down trees is called ‘deforestation'. The good news is that it is slowing down.
Dịch: Quá trình chặt cây này được gọi là "phá rừng". Tin tốt là nó đang chậm lại.
Rewrite the 2nd sentence
1 He never suspected that the money had been stolen
=> At no
2. They produce a lot of paper, so they need a lot of woop pulp
=> The more
3. The price of the house has been reduced as much as possible because the owner needs some money ( BONE )
4. You/kind/reserve/single room/me?
Thank you guys
Rewrite the 2nd sentence
1 He never suspected that the money had been stolen
=> At no time did he suspect that the money had been stolen.
2. They produce a lot of paper, so they need a lot of woop pulp
=> The more paper they produce, the more wood pulp they need.
3. The price of the house has been reduced as much as possible because the owner needs some money ( BONE )
The house has been cut to the bone because the owner needs some money.
4. You/kind/reserve/single room/me?
Could you kindly reserve a single room for me?
Mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the sentence that is closest in meaning to each of the following questions.
Cultural changes have never been as accelerated as they are now during the globalization.
A. Never before cultural changes have been as accelerated as they are now during the globalization.
B. Never before cultural have changes been as accelerated as they are now during the globalization.
C. Never before have been cultural changes as accelerated as they are now during the globalization.
D. Never before have cultural changes been as accelerated as they are now during the globalization.
Đáp án D
Kiến thức về cấu trúc đảo ngữ của thì hiện tại hoàn thành
Never before + have/has + S + Vp2
Never before: chưa từng, chưa bao giờ trước đó
Đề bài: Những thay đổi về văn hóa chưa bao giờ được thúc giục như bây giờ, lúc mà chúng đang trong quá trình toàn cầu hóa.
= D. Chưa bao giờ trước đó những thay đổi về văn hóa được thúc giục như bây giờ, lúc mà chúng đang trong quá trình toàn cầu hóa.
Các đáp án khác sai với cấu trúc này.
Cấu trúc khác cần lưu ý: as + adj + as: như là
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.
Genetic modification of foods is not a new practice. It has been practiced for thousands of years under the name of "selective breeding". Animals and plants were chosen because they had traits that humans found useful. Some animals were larger and stronger than others, or they yielded more food, or they had some other trait that humans valued. Therefore, they were bred because of those traits. Individuals with those traits were brought together and allowed to breed in the hope that their offspring would have the same traits in greater measure.
Much the same thing was done with plants. To produce bigger or sweeter fruit, or grow more grain per unit of land, strains of plants were combined and recombined to produce hybrids, or crossbreeds that had the desired traits in the right combinations. All the while, however, biologists wondered: is there a more direct and versatile way to change the traits of plants and animals? Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
In the 20th century, genetic modification made such changes possible at last. Now, it was possible to alter the genetic code without using the slow and uncertain process of selective breeding. It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing. The result was a tremendous potential to change the very nature of biology.
The word "them" in paragraph 2 refers to ______.
A. organisms
B. traits
C. animals
D. plants
Từ “them” trong đoạn 2 liên hệ với ______.
A. organisms (n): các sinh vật
B. traits (n): đặc điểm (=features, characteristics)
C. animals (n): động vật
D. plants (n): thực vật
Thông tin: Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
Tạm dịch: Chúng ta có thể viết lại, theo một cách nào đó, tính di truyền của các sinh vật để làm cho chúng phục vụ nhu cầu của chúng ta tốt hơn?
Chọn A
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.
Genetic modification of foods is not a new practice. It has been practiced for thousands of years under the name of "selective breeding". Animals and plants were chosen because they had traits that humans found useful. Some animals were larger and stronger than others, or they yielded more food, or they had some other trait that humans valued. Therefore, they were bred because of those traits. Individuals with those traits were brought together and allowed to breed in the hope that their offspring would have the same traits in greater measure.
Much the same thing was done with plants. To produce bigger or sweeter fruit, or grow more grain per unit of land, strains of plants were combined and recombined to produce hybrids, or crossbreeds that had the desired traits in the right combinations. All the while, however, biologists wondered: is there a more direct and versatile way to change the traits of plants and animals? Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
In the 20th century, genetic modification made such changes possible at last. Now, it was possible to alter the genetic code without using the slow and uncertain process of selective breeding. It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing. The result was a tremendous potential to change the very nature of biology.
The word "blend" in paragraph 3 mostly means ______.
A. combine
B. collect
C. gather
D. carry
Từ “blend” trong đoạn 3 gần nghĩa với _____.
A. combine (v): trộn, kết hợp
B. collect (v): thu thập
C. gather (v): tập trung
D. carry (v): mang, vác, xách
Thông tin: It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing.
Tạm dịch: Thậm chí, người ta có thể trộn thực vật và động vật về mặt di truyền: ví dụ, lấy gen động vật chèn vào thực vật, để tạo cho cây một đặc điểm nhất định mà chúng thường thiếu, chẳng hạn như chống lại sự đóng băng.
Chọn A
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.
Genetic modification of foods is not a new practice. It has been practiced for thousands of years under the name of "selective breeding". Animals and plants were chosen because they had traits that humans found useful. Some animals were larger and stronger than others, or they yielded more food, or they had some other trait that humans valued. Therefore, they were bred because of those traits. Individuals with those traits were brought together and allowed to breed in the hope that their offspring would have the same traits in greater measure.
Much the same thing was done with plants. To produce bigger or sweeter fruit, or grow more grain per unit of land, strains of plants were combined and recombined to produce hybrids, or crossbreeds that had the desired traits in the right combinations. All the while, however, biologists wondered: is there a more direct and versatile way to change the traits of plants and animals? Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
In the 20th century, genetic modification made such changes possible at last. Now, it was possible to alter the genetic code without using the slow and uncertain process of selective breeding. It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing. The result was a tremendous potential to change the very nature of biology
The word "blend" in paragraph 3 mostly means ______.
A. combine
B. collect
C. gather
D. carry
Chọn A
Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu
Giải thích:
Từ “blend” trong đoạn 3 có nghĩa?
“blend” (v): pha trộn
A. combine (v): kết hợp
B. collect (v): thu lượm
C. gather (v): tụ tập
D. carry (v): mang
=> blend = combine
Thông tin: It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing.
Tạm dịch: Thậm chí đã trở nên có khả năng pha trộn về gen của thực vật và động vật: để chèn các gen động vật vào thực vật, ví dụ, để cung cấp cho thực vật một đặc tính nhất định mà chúng nói chung đang thiếu, như là khả năng chống đóng băng
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.
Genetic modification of foods is not a new practice. It has been practiced for thousands of years under the name of "selective breeding". Animals and plants were chosen because they had traits that humans found useful. Some animals were larger and stronger than others, or they yielded more food, or they had some other trait that humans valued. Therefore, they were bred because of those traits. Individuals with those traits were brought together and allowed to breed in the hope that their offspring would have the same traits in greater measure.
Much the same thing was done with plants. To produce bigger or sweeter fruit, or grow more grain per unit of land, strains of plants were combined and recombined to produce hybrids, or crossbreeds that had the desired traits in the right combinations. All the while, however, biologists wondered: is there a more direct and versatile way to change the traits of plants and animals? Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
In the 20th century, genetic modification made such changes possible at last. Now, it was possible to alter the genetic code without using the slow and uncertain process of selective breeding. It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing. The result was a tremendous potential to change the very nature of biology
The word "them" in paragraph 2 refers to ______.
A. organisms
B. traits
C. animals
D. plants
Chọn A
Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu
Giải thích:
Từ “them” trong đoạn 2 đề cập tới?
A. organisms (n): sinh vật
B. traits (n): đặc điểm
C. animals (n): động vật
D. plants (n): thực vật
Thông tin: Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
Tạm dịch: Chúng ta có thể viết lại, có thể nói vậy, sự di truyền của các sinh vật để khiến chúng phục vụ nhu cầu của chúng ta tốt hơn?
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.
Genetic modification of foods is not a new practice. It has been practiced for thousands of years under the name of "selective breeding". Animals and plants were chosen because they had traits that humans found useful. Some animals were larger and stronger than others, or they yielded more food, or they had some other trait that humans valued. Therefore, they were bred because of those traits. Individuals with those traits were brought together and allowed to breed in the hope that their offspring would have the same traits in greater measure.
Much the same thing was done with plants. To produce bigger or sweeter fruit, or grow more grain per unit of land, strains of plants were combined and recombined to produce hybrids, or crossbreeds that had the desired traits in the right combinations. All the while, however, biologists wondered: is there a more direct and versatile way to change the traits of plants and animals? Could we rewrite, so to speak, the heredity of organisms to make them serve our needs better?
In the 20th century, genetic modification made such changes possible at last. Now, it was possible to alter the genetic code without using the slow and uncertain process of selective breeding. It even became possible to blend plants and animals genetically: to insert animal genes into plants, for example, in order to give the plants a certain trait they ordinarily would lack, such as resistance to freezing. The result was a tremendous potential to change the very nature of biology
Which of the following IS NOT achieved by genetic modification?
A. Giving plants necessary traits taken from animals’ genes
B. Producing hybrids or crossbreeds from many animals and plants
C. Encouraging people to give up selective breeding completely
D. Making big changes to the very nature of biology
Chọn C
Kiến thức: Đọc hiểu
Giải thích:
Cái nào sau đây không đạt được bởi biến đổi gen?
A. Cung cấp cho thực vật những đặc tính cần thiết từ gen động vật
B. Sản xuất giống lai khác loài hoặc lai khác giống từ nhiều động vật và thực vật
C. Khuyến khích mọi người hoàn toàn bỏ gây giống có chọn lọc
D. Tạo ra những thay đổi lớn với bản chất của sinh học
Dịch bài đọc:
Biến đổi gen của thực phẩm không phải là một thực hành mới mẻ. Nó đã được thực hiện hàng ngàn năm qua dưới cái tên “gây giống chọn lọc”. Động vật và thực vật được chọn lựa bởi vì chúng có những đặc tính mà con người thấy hữu dụng. Một vài con vật thì to hơn và khỏe hơn những con khác, hoặc chúng sản xuất ra nhiều thực phẩm, hoặc là chúng có đặc tính khác mà con người thấy giá trị. Do đó, chúng được nhân giống vì các đặc tính như vậy. Các cá thể với đặc tính đó được tập hợp lại và được cho phép sinh sản với hi vong rằng con cái của chúng sẽ có cùng đặc tính giống nhau trong số lượng lớn hơn.
Nhiều điều tương tự cũng đã thực hiện trên thực vật. Để tạo ra quả to hơn và ngọt hơn, hoặc trồng được nhiều ngũ cốc hơn trên một đơn vị đất đai, các chủng loại thực vật được kết hợp và tái kết hợp lại để tạo ra các giống lai khác loài hoặc giống lai khác giống, có những đặc tính mong muốn trong các kết hợp đúng. Suốt thời gian đó, tuy nhiên, các nhà khoa học đã tự hỏi: liệu có các nào trực tiếp và linh hoạt hơn để thay đổi các đặc tính của động vật và thực vật không? Chúng ta có thể viết lại, có thể nói như vậy, sự di truyền của các sinh vật để khiến chúng phục vụ nhu cầu của chúng ta tốt hơn?
Trong thế kỷ hai mươi, cuối cùng thì biến đổi gen cũng đã tạo ra được những thay đổi. Ngày nay, có khả năng để thay đổi mã di truyền mà không cần sử dụng quá trình gây giống có chọn lọc vừa chậm và không chắc chắn nữa. Thậm chí đã trở nên có khả năng pha trộn về gen của thực vật và động vật: để chèn các gen động vật vào thực vật, ví dụ, để cung cấp cho thực vật một đặc tính nhất định mà chúng nói chung đang thiếu, như là khả năng chống đóng băng. Kết quả này là một tiềm năng to lớn để thay đổi bản chất của sinh học