Học tại trường Chưa có thông tin
Đến từ Chưa có thông tin , Chưa có thông tin
Số lượng câu hỏi 48
Số lượng câu trả lời 14
Điểm GP 0
Điểm SP 4

Người theo dõi (0)

Đang theo dõi (0)


đề: find the incoherent sentences ( bài này có 3 cái)

[1] On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. [2] A wide variety of animals is currently in use for laboratory tests, with the most common being mice or rats thanks to their short life span and high fertility rate. [3] To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. [4] Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. [5] In fact, animal right activists aren’t just the people you see holding up signs when you’re commuting to work in the morning, and they are certainly not violent protestors who burn down lab buildings with the animals inside.

--

 [6] They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. 

[7] On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. [8] Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. [9] As can be seen from reality, through gnawing, nest-building, and defecation, both rats and mice can cause a great deal of damage to the structure of people’s homes as well as eating and contaminating their food. [10] They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. [11] If the worst case scenario of death unfortunately happens, the bereavement period is associated with elevated risk for the onset of multiple psychiatric disorders, consistently across the life course and coincident with the experience. [12] Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.undefined

undefined helppppppppppp
find the incoherent sentences
[1] On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. [2] A wide variety of animals is currently in use for laboratory tests, with the most common being mice or rats thanks to their short life span and high fertility rate. [3] To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. [4] Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. [5] In fact, animal right activists aren’t just the people you see holding up signs when you’re commuting to work in the morning, and they are certainly not violent protestors who burn down lab buildings with the animals inside.
--
 [6] They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. 
[7] On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. [8] Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. [9] As can be seen from reality, through gnawing, nest-building, and defecation, both rats and mice can cause a great deal of damage to the structure of people’s homes as well as eating and contaminating their food. [10] They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. [11] If the worst case scenario of death unfortunately happens, the bereavement period is associated with elevated risk for the onset of multiple psychiatric disorders, consistently across the life course and coincident with the experience. [12] Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.