Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.

While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.

When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.

In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.

All around the world, tourism is losing its glitter, due to the lack of responsibility by the government, tourists and local people. Some people consider taking responsibility in tourism by each individual is essential for the better environment, preserving cultures and improving the economy, whereas others think, this cannot be achieved in reality. In my opinion, tourism responsibility is required for better future of the world and this can be achieved with proper implementation.

People travel to different places but never show any attention or responsibility towards its improvement. To make this world a better place to live in, one should take it as one’s responsibility. First of all, the government should take a step, releasing more funds towards tourism and for providing much security. For instance, we find filthy guest houses, restrooms and no cleaning of surrounding places. People travel to enjoy the beauty of nature, but if they find this kind of dirty places, their enjoyment which lead to a bad memory. Even, local people and tourists who travel should obey the guidelines and policy of tourism for a better world.

However, there are some people who think when it comes to implementation of this; it is like a day dream which cannot come into reality. It is difficult for poor and developing countries to utilise more funds towards tourism. On the other hand, it is difficult to provide security and neatness at tourist spots unless every tourist shows attention as his responsibility. For instance, if there are sign boards which shows ‘please use right direction, danger at left direction’, they use only left and if there are any dustbins with ‘please use me’ , they do not use them at all. Thus it is very difficult to make it into reality.

In conclusion, better tourism can be achieved only if every individual takes the responsibility towards tourism. One should think, how much one is contributing, instead of just arguing and blaming the government. But the government should take the first step in achieving this. With this, not only it increases blissfulness of tourists but also increases economy of the country.

Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.

While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.

When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.

In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.

Bạn có thể tham khảo bài này ở trang IELTS Mentor nha!

There is a common belief that in a family, men’s role is to work and women take a responsibility for home. While I agree with that notion, I also believe that today, the task of both genders are equal on the society and at home

At the outset, it will better for families if the task of earning money is for males and females take care of the family. It is true that maternal instincts is necessary for children. What mothers do is likely to more careful than that of fathers in terms of housework. Therefore, a house which is taken care by mothers would be cozy and happy that contributes to a sustainable society for a nation. A typical example is in Japan, a high proportion of women would stop their career path for spending more time on home. Moreover, these days, the pressure of work has been significantly increasing day by day. Females tend to be more negatively affected than males in life. As a result, more and more divorces have occurred which the primary reason is that women cannot obtain a balance between work and family.

Despite those above arguments, nowadays, gender role is equality which both men and women have the same responsibility for family. Children need to be educated and nurtured from fathers and mothers for full development. Without father’s attention, children might not learn strong characters. In term of financial issues, If men only make money for whole family, not only males will be under heavily burden of monetary but also the family tend to deal with the risk of finance in case of unemployment. Additionally, the awareness of people in gender issues has been raisen in societies recently. Hence, women have rights to have a job outside for broadening their mind and helping family.

In conclusion, although I argue that men’s role is to go to work and women’s main mission is to take care of family, I am of the opinion that females should obtain a job in a company.

For a long time, television has been regarded as a saving means of entertainment and acquiring useful knowledge. However, besides the benefits mentioned above, it also brings a lot of harm because of the following reasons. First, watching TV takes up a lot of our time. I do not deny the benefits such as entertainment or education that it brings. However, instead of spending all the day just watching TV, we can do some useful works such as doing homework, helping mother to do housework. Through that, we can gather for ourselves a lot of soft skills and become closer to the other. Second, sitting too close to the TV screen will make harm affect on our health. Studies have shown that sitting near television will shorten our vision, in addition increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases and degeneration of the neck vertebrae ... These are the disadvantages that no one expects. Therefore, let's limit the amount of time spending watching TV and save that time doing other useful things.

 

In recent years, due to the strong development of new advanced technologies, children in big cities have a great opportunity to be exposed to it from an early age. So most people assume that there are broad and serious aspects not only to education, but also to children's development. In my opinion, TV has an impact on both

On the one hand, I agree that watching too much is harmful to children's education and psychological development. Firstly, compared to other activities, children spend too much time on TV, leading to lack of learning. As a result, their learning can be reduced, or worse, they can be expelled from school. Second, greater involvement in inappropriate planning is associated with a number of negative effects on psychological development such as violence, depression, and autism. In addition, sitting in front of the TV for a long time can cause many dangerous diseases, such as obesity or myopia. This brings not only an economic burden to their families, but also an economic burden to society.

On the other hand, there is some undeniable evidence demonstrating the widespread benefits of television. I think so because the amount of knowledge in the 21st century comes not only from school or home, but also from digital devices like television or the Internet. For example, children can use documentaries or reality TV shows to identify different soft skills, such as problem-solving, communication, or survival skills. In addition, according to some scientific reports on TV, children can expand their knowledge to develop physically and mentally, for example, "remember to drink at least 2 liters of water a day to promote metabolism. metabolism” or “be careful when going out at night. Because it is possible to encounter some evil activities of society " Collectively, it has been proven that regular parental guidance is very beneficial for children to watch TV to gain more useful knowledge. for yourself.

When I was little, like other children, I liked watching TV very much. I used to watch for hours from morning until afternoon. However, watching TV too much gives me a lot of trouble. First of all, my eyesight is very weak now. When watching television, the eyes have to focus on the screen so they are usually stressed and over-regulated. Day by day, my vision is more and more narrowed and I could not see anything without wearing glasses. Second, the time spending watching television has taken away the opportunity to go out and make friends, learn and interact with people. The outside world has so many interesting and amazing things that are waiting for us to discover while on TV screen, we can see but not directly experience. As a result, I lack a lot of living experience, necessary soft skills, not agile as other children at the same age. In addition, another harm is that it makes me become obese. When watching movies, I can not control the amount of food put into the body, and especially some kinds such as fast food, carbonated drinks. So that my weight increase rapidly, the body is unbalanced. After realizing these harmful effects, I limit to the maximum watching television, hopefully that through my story, you can collect yourself some useful experience.

hope you comment on my post !

Some people believe that printed newspapers are becoming worthless in the contemporary life. While there are a variety of ground supporting this view, I would argue that printed newspapers continue to play an essential role in life.
Continuous advancement in technology provides people with more convenient options for gathering news which are alternatives for printed newspapers. First, an enormous number of articles or reports nowadays could be assessed merely via smartphones or computer with the internet connection, and not only does the news contain a broad spectrum of contents but it can also be updated by the minute. It is obviously more convenient than the traditional measure of reading news, for example, on daily newspapers with limited content in few pages. Second, the spread of alternative options namely the radio or the internet which reach almost every corner of the world has reduced the dependence on printed newspapers as a main source of information.
Despite such advantages of the news conveys by other faster means, I consider that there is still a continuing need for printed newspapers today. One reason is that reading a newspaper is a daily habit which many people, especially the elderly, still enjoy. They are really interested in the leisurely routine of reading newspapers over breakfast or drinking cups of coffee. Another consideration is people can share the newspapers with others since printed newspapers can simply be picked up or put down at a will. For example, I often read a newspaper on the train or bus and then leave the paper on the seat for other passengers if they wish.
In conclusion, albeit the increasing availability of other high-speed sources of news, newspapers still contribute a certain value to human life today.

I don't think that talent, wealth and attraction cannot bring happiness to people because they have these things but they don't have love, they don't care about others, how can they be called happiness? I think happy people will always think about others, think positively, always work hard, appreciate the smallest and most important things they know to give away without getting back.

            _{In recent years, Traffic congestion and pollution have increased significantly and become a major problem worldwide. Some people think that increasing petrol prices will solve such problems. Although it is possible that higher gas prices will solve traffic and pollution problems to a large extent, I completely disagree with this opinion. I believe that increasing the cost of petrol is not a viable solution that everyone can do. Although it can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, it brings many disadvantages or difficulties for people both physically and mentally. Increasing gasoline prices is only a matter of time. Because businesses know in advance, if the world gasoline price increases, they will be compensated by the State (or sooner or later people will also suffer because the State increases the price), and if the world price decreases, They still sell at a high price. People have witnessed too many times when the world gasoline price increases, the domestic gasoline price increases, but the opposite happens very rarely: the world gasoline price decreases while the domestic gasoline price remains stationary. Instead of increasing the price of gasoline. fuel, the government can take a number of other measures to effectively deal with this problem. First, corporate companies whose employees only require a computer to do their jobs should allow them to work from home at least 3-4 days a week. This will reduce the carbon footprint of commuters who go to work every day. Another solution is that governments should create new laws that limit the number of vehicles a household can own. This will limit unnecessary spending on new cars and motorbikes. Both of these solutions can have a positive impact on the environment while discouraging excessive vehicle use. Improving the frequency and reliability of public transport is another way to encourage private car use. A better solution is to find measures that will work in the long run. To illustrate, increased investment in alternative fuels and improved public transport are more effective measures than increasing gasoline prices. Traffic and pollution problems will not be solved until people start using public transport. For this reason, the government should provide cheap public transport and ban cars from the city center. In short, air pollution and traffic problems cannot be solved by increasing spending. fuel costs. Instead, the government should make public transport more reliable and promote work-from-home options to reduce people's need to travel.}

If gasoline is increasing if you don't know how to use it, it will be polluted and the air will not be good and I disagree, and here are my solutions to protect the environment:
Plant many green trees
No littering
Pick up trash when you see it
No smoking and no littering vứt
Do not burn trees and do not kill trees
Do not harvest too much wood
Must know how to love green plants
Should clean up the roadside garbage to let the air fresh
should not pee in green trees and do heavy hygiene
Here are the ways you can solve to protect the environment, teachers tick

Traffic congestion and pollution are two pressing issues all over the world. As the majority of cars and motobikes are petrol driven, elevating petrol price can reduce their numbers on the roads, and as a result, help control traffic congestions and pollution to a great extent, I agree. Unlike the past, when only rich people could afford automobiles, a majority of car and motorbike owners, these days, are from middle-class families. Therefore, a higher fuel cost will affect their budget. Such surge in prices will increase the demand for public transportations which is by far the most efficient way to pull out the pollution. Moreover, such a price hike will make eco-friendly automobiles popular. For instance, electric cars or electric bikes can become a viable option for consumers. Although it cannot reduce traffic problems, it can reduce pollutions effectively. Other solutions can also be considered instead of upscaling petroleum price only. To begin with, the government can implement policies to restrict the number of cars per family can own, and also offer subsidies to citizens to purchase electric cars and eletric bikes. To conclude, increasing petrol price will open the doors for alternative options which can, directly and indirectly, combat both traffic and pollution problems.

Sample Answer :
In many countries, especially in developing countries, foreign movies are more popular than the locally made films. There are several reasons for this trend and the government can and should greatly contribute to promoting domestic movies for the overall progress of the industry.

The main reason people prefer movies from other countries is the quality of the movie. It is often noticed that locally made films in many countries lack better plots and the characters do not have the necessary depth to touch the hearts of the audiences. Moreover, foreign films have a great variation and they are more enjoyable than the domestic films. This happens because large film industries like the Hollywood can allocate a huge budget and have talented producers and directors while films made in developing countries have a small amount to spend on a movie and do not have many talented movie makers. For instance, the type of animated movies and special effects developing countries produce these days are unimaginable in most of the developing countries and this is why movie lovers from these countries prefer to watch movies made in other countries. The poor quality of acting and low-budget filmmaking in most of the developing countries discourage the audiences to enjoy local films.

In my opinion, the government should support the film industry in order to support this industry, encourage people to enjoy more domestically produced films and gain international acclimation for quality movies. Each country has some talented producers, actors and filmmakers who for the lack of financial and political support cannot bring out the best. They should be given a chance to prove themselves. No doubt big budget is required to make better quality films and the government should provide subsidiary to help local film industry progress. Government’s help for the movie industry would bring more audiences to the theatre to enjoy those films and earn more ticket money. Moreover, quality films would compete in international stages and bring fame for the country.

In conclusion, the film industry in each country should be supported by the government as it would make local films popular and earn money and fame for the country.

#Nhi ☺