A great deal of what you write is intended to convince the reader that you have an important point to make. When you write a letter applying for a job you want to convince the reader that you are the right person for the job. When you write a review of a film you want to convince the reader that you have something important to say about the film, and maybe you recommend it, or, on the other hand, suggest that it is not worth seeing. In an essay on some aspect of American government you want to convince the reader that you can answer the questions that have been posed and that you can throw light on specific aspects of American government. In all these three examples you want to show your reader that you have something sensible and important to say about the topic that is under discussion.You do this by arguing your case. You offer “a line of argument” keeping it within the framework of the chosen topic. For example, your letter of application for a job has a presentation of yourself and your qualifications as its framework. “You” are the topic! It might therefore be relevant to mention your hobbies in your letter. If you are applying for a job in a bookshop it would be sensible to point out that reading is one of your hobbies, if it is. You include this in the line of argument running through the letter, perhaps giving this information after you have listed your education and other formal qualifications. You do not, however, spend a paragraph writing about your brother’s or sister’s hobbies. That would be irrelevant. Information about them falls outside the framework you have constructed.

Similarly, if the topic is American government and the question is “Does the President have too much power?” you do not write about American geography or American sports. You write about the mechanics of political power in the USA, showing step by step whether, in your view, the President does or does not have too much power.

You must, then, avoid irrelevance. Keep a sharp focus on your topic.

The regulation to prohibit mobile phones in secondary schools is a topic of considerable debate. On one hand, mobile phones can be a significant distraction, potentially disrupting the learning environment and facilitating cheating. They can also contribute to social issues, such as cyberbullying. On the other hand, mobile phones are powerful tools for learning and communication, providing students with access to educational resources and a means to contact family in emergencies. Ultimately, the effectiveness of such a regulation depends on its implementation and the school’s ability to provide alternative resources. A balanced approach, where mobile phone use is regulated rather than completely banned, might serve to mitigate the drawbacks while still harnessing the benefits of technology in education.

cậu tham khảo đoạn văn này nha

Since the advent of technology, it has provided us with a more convenient life, but to some extent it has reduced people's ability to reason. Since everyone has depended on them, there will be an inability and sufficient awareness to cope with adverse circumstances. So besides the advantages of technology, we cannot help but mention the limitations of laziness and reliance on human technology.

Chúc cậu học tốt :)))))))))))))))