Bạn chưa đăng nhập. Vui lòng đăng nhập để hỏi bài
Lê Quỳnh  Anh

Read the following passage and blacken the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

        Until recently, hunting for treasure from shipwrecks was mostly fantasy; with recent technological advances, however, the search for sunken treasure has become more popular as a legitimate endeavor. This has caused a debate between those wanting to salvage the wrecks and those wanting to preserve them.

        Treasure hunters are spurred on by the thought of finding caches of gold coins or other valuable objects on a sunken ship. One team of salvagers, for instance, searched the wreck of the RMS Republic, which sank outside the Boston harbor in 1900. The search party, using side-scan sonar, a device that projects sound waves across the ocean bottom and produces a profile of the sea floor, located the wreck in just two and a half days. Before the use of this new technology, such searches could take months or years. The team of divers searched the wreck for two months, finding silver tea services, crystal dinnerware, and thousands of bottles of wine, but they did not find the five and a half tons of American Gold Eagle coins they were searching for.

        Preservationists focus on the historic value of a ship. They say that even if a shipwreck's treasure does not have a high monetary value, it can be an invaluable source of historic artifacts that are preserved in nearly mint condition. But once a salvage team has scoured a site, much of the archaeological value is lost. Maritime archaeologists who are preservationists worry that the success of salvagers will attract more treasure-hunting expeditions and thus threaten remaining undiscovered wrecks. Preservationists are lobbying their state lawmakers to legally restrict underwater searches and unregulated salvages. To counter their efforts, treasure hunters argue that without the lure of gold and million-dollar treasures, the wrecks and their historical artifacts would never be recovered at all.

The second and third paragraphs are an example of_________.

A. chronological order

B. explanation

C. specific to general 

D. definition

Dương Hoàn Anh
5 tháng 1 2018 lúc 8:08

Đáp án B.

A. chronological order: trình tự thời gian

B. explanation: giải thích

C. specific to general: từ chung đến riêng

D. definition: định nghĩa

Ta thấy đoạn văn thứ 2 và thứ 3 được viết không theo trình tự thời gian, không theo trình tự từ chung đến riêng và không đưa ra định nghĩa nào mà chỉ đơn giản là sự giải thích về các cuộc tìm kiếm tàu chìm và quan điểm của những người muốn bảo tồn tàu chìm do đó đáp án chính xác là B.


Các câu hỏi tương tự
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết
Lê Quỳnh  Anh
Xem chi tiết