Học tại trường Chưa có thông tin
Đến từ Phú Thọ , Chưa có thông tin
Số lượng câu hỏi 36
Số lượng câu trả lời 270
Điểm GP 53
Điểm SP 251

Người theo dõi (55)

jackson
quynh pham
Ngưu Kim

Đang theo dõi (5)

Hung nguyen
Kuro Kazuya
Hà Đức Thọ

Câu trả lời:

VI.Rewrite the sentences:{2,5ms}

1.Sydney Opera House /completed/1973/was.

Ø………………………………………………………………………………………..

2.a machine/is/ this/ used to/ wash/ clothes/which/is.

=> This is a machine which is used to wash clothes.

3.the/ held/ festival/was/where?

=> Where was the festival held?

4.an important/ Christmas/festival/ in many countries/is.

=> Christmas is an important festival in many countries.

5.people/took/ part/ how/ in/each/ activity/ many ?

=> How many people took part in each activity?

6. Hue / Mr Nam / tonight / arriving / in / is.

=> Mr Nam is arriving in Hue tonight.

7. live / in / months / going / England / they / two / are / to.

=> They are going to live two months in England.

8. It / not / difficult / is / this sentence / to / translate / into / English.

=> It is not difficult to translate this sentence into English.

9. Last week / she / buy English - Vietnamese dictionary

=> Last week, she bought an English - Vietnamese dictionary.

10/ Do/ mind/ if/ you/ close/ I/ the/ window? (sắp xếp)

=> Do you mind if I close the window?

11. delighted/ passed / I / that / you / English / am/ exams / your / have. (sắp xếp)

=> I am delighted that you have passed your English exams.

12. storm / destroyed / the / are / houses/ now/ the / by / rebuilt/ being. (sắp xếp)

=> The houses destroyed by the storm are now being rebuilt.

13.He/ his/ him/ birthday/ happy/ is/ parents/ give/ a/ that/ will/ present/ very. (sắp xếp)

=> He is very happy that his parents will give him a birthday present.

14. I / live / far / city / so / life / quite / peaceful

=> I live far from the city so my life is quite peaceful.

15. Everyday / get / early / 4.30

=> Everyday, I get up early at 4.30.

16. I / clean / teeth / wash / face / have quick breakfast / walk / school

=> I clean my teeth, wash my face, have a quick breakfast and then walk to school.

17. It / take / 2 hours / get there

=> It takes me 2 hours to get there.

18. I / usually / have / lessons / morning / so / often / home late / 11.20

=> I usually have many lessons in the morning so I often go home late at 11.20.

19. I / study hard / school / because / not / have time / study / home

=> I study hard at school because I do not have time to study at home.

20. I / help / parents / work / farm / afternoon

=> I help my parents work on the farm in the afternoon.

21. Summer/ parents / often / take me / Vung Tau

=> In the summer, my parents often take me to VT.

22. It / be / great time / because / I / spend / all time / there / go / swim

=> It is a great time because I spend all time there going swimming.

23. Although / life / country / still hard / I / love / very much

=> Although the life in the country is still hard, I love it very much.

 

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 35 to 42.

  The idea of preserving biological diversity gives most people a warm feeling inside. But what, exactly, is diversity? And which kind is most worth preserving? It may be anathema to save-the-lot environmentalists who hate setting such priorities, but academics are starting to cook up answers.

  Andrew Solow, a mathematician at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and his colleagues argue that in the eyes of conservation, all species should not be equal. Even more controversially, they suggest that preserving the rarest is not always the best approach. Their measure of diversity is the amount of evolutionary distance between species. They reckon that if choices must be made, then the number of times that cousins are removed from one another should be one of the criteria.

  This makes sense from both a practical and an aesthetic point of view. Close relatives have many genes in common. If those genes might be medically or agriculturally valuable, saving one is nearly as good as saving both. And different forms are more interesting to admire and study than lots of things that look the same. Dr Solow’s group illustrates its thesis with an example. Six species of crane are at some risk of extinction. Breeding in captivity might save them. But suppose there were only enough money to protect three. Which ones should be picked?

  The genetic distances between 14 species of cranes, including the six at risk, have already been established using a technique known as DNA hybridisation. The group estimated how likely it was that each of these 14 species would become extinct in the next 50 years. Unendangered species were assigned a 10% chance of meeting the Darwinian reaper-man; the most vulnerable, a 90% chance. Captive breeding was assumed to reduce an otherwise endangered species’ risk to the 10% level of the safest. Dr Solow’s computer permed all possible combinations of three from six and came to the conclusion that protecting the Siberian, white-naped and black-necked cranes gave the smallest likely loss of biological diversity over the next five decades. The other three had close relatives in little need of protection. Even if they became extinct, most of their genes would be saved.

  Building on the work of this group, Martin Weitzman, of Harvard University, argues that conservation policy needs to take account not only of some firm measure of the genetic relationships of species to each other and their likelihood of survival, but also the costs of preserving them. Where species are equally important in genetic terms, and - an important and improbable precondition - where the protection of one species can be assured at the expense of another, he argues for making safe species safer, rather than endangered species less endangered.

  In practice, it is difficult to choose between species. Most of those at risk - especially plants, the group most likely to yield useful medicines - are under threat because their habitats are in trouble, not because they are being shot, or plucked, to extinction. Nor can conservationists choose among the millions of species that theory predicts must exist, but that have not yet been classified by the biologists assigned to that tedious task.

  This is not necessarily cause for despair. At the moment, the usual way to save the genes in these creatures is to find the bits of the world with the largest number of species and try to protect them from the bulldozers. What economists require from biologists are more sophisticated ways to estimate the diversity of groups of organisms that happen to live together, as well as those which are related to each other. With clearer goals established, economic theory can then tell environmentalists where to go.

[from The Economist]

Dr Weitzman believes that if two species are equally important genetically we should protect _____________.

 

A. the one that is more attractive 

B. them both 

C. the less endangered one 

D. the rarer one