* Topic sentence: Secondary school students should be allowed to use cell phones because of the benefits they bring them about.

* Supporting ideas:

- Firstly: They are good for education.

+ You can use cell phones for research purposes.

+ Studying with a boring book may be hard to understand, but playing an educational app is much more exciting.

- Secondly: Allowing them to use cell phone prepares students for adult life because it's the tools that they will be using in their adult life.

- Finally: It'll help them keep their social life active.

+ If students have their cell phones at school they can continue talking to their friends, text or call their parents

+ In an emergency it will help them contact with the paramedicsand

* In conclusion, cell phones is helpful so students should be allowed to use them at school

thôi bài dưới dễ hơn tự viết đi hoặc lên mạng chép

Kiến thức: Ngôn ngữ giao tiếp

Giải thích:

Sue và Mira đang nói về việc sử dụng điện thoại di động trong lớp.

– Sue: “Sinh viên không được phép sử dụng điện thoại di động trong lớp.”

– Mira: “____. Nó sẽ khiến họ phân tâm không thể học được .”

  A. Không hẳn                                             B. Không đời nào! Nó có ích mà

  C. Tôi có quan điểm trái ngược với bạn        D. Tôi khá đồng ý với bạn

Các phương án A, B, C không phù hợp với tình huống.

Chọn D

A great deal of what you write is intended to convince the reader that you have an important point to make. When you write a letter applying for a job you want to convince the reader that you are the right person for the job. When you write a review of a film you want to convince the reader that you have something important to say about the film, and maybe you recommend it, or, on the other hand, suggest that it is not worth seeing. In an essay on some aspect of American government you want to convince the reader that you can answer the questions that have been posed and that you can throw light on specific aspects of American government. In all these three examples you want to show your reader that you have something sensible and important to say about the topic that is under discussion.You do this by arguing your case. You offer “a line of argument” keeping it within the framework of the chosen topic. For example, your letter of application for a job has a presentation of yourself and your qualifications as its framework. “You” are the topic! It might therefore be relevant to mention your hobbies in your letter. If you are applying for a job in a bookshop it would be sensible to point out that reading is one of your hobbies, if it is. You include this in the line of argument running through the letter, perhaps giving this information after you have listed your education and other formal qualifications. You do not, however, spend a paragraph writing about your brother’s or sister’s hobbies. That would be irrelevant. Information about them falls outside the framework you have constructed.

Similarly, if the topic is American government and the question is “Does the President have too much power?” you do not write about American geography or American sports. You write about the mechanics of political power in the USA, showing step by step whether, in your view, the President does or does not have too much power.

You must, then, avoid irrelevance. Keep a sharp focus on your topic.

The regulation to prohibit mobile phones in secondary schools is a topic of considerable debate. On one hand, mobile phones can be a significant distraction, potentially disrupting the learning environment and facilitating cheating. They can also contribute to social issues, such as cyberbullying. On the other hand, mobile phones are powerful tools for learning and communication, providing students with access to educational resources and a means to contact family in emergencies. Ultimately, the effectiveness of such a regulation depends on its implementation and the school’s ability to provide alternative resources. A balanced approach, where mobile phone use is regulated rather than completely banned, might serve to mitigate the drawbacks while still harnessing the benefits of technology in education.

Sue và Mira đang nói về việc sử dụng điện thoại trong lớp học.

Sue nói: “Sinh viên không nên được cho phép sử dụng điện thoại đi động trong lớp.”

Mira: “_____. Điều này sẽ khiến học sinh bị sao nhãng.”

=> Mira đồng tình với quan điểm của Sue

A. Không hẳn. (không đồng tình) => Loại

B. Không đời nào. Nó rất có ích. (không đồng tình) => Loại

C. Tôi có quan điểm trái chiều. (không đồng tình) => Loại

D. Tôi đồng tình với bạn.

Chọn D

I agree. Because I can call my parents to pick me up when they forgot the time.

I disagree. Because students can play games during the class, check messages or doing silly things.